Finally, the behaviorist approach is concerned with the distinction

between the objective and the subjective. Based on the philosophy of a

supposed realism, the methodological behaviorists attempted to

explain behavior in terms of the strictly observable. Introspection was

rejected as a method of psychological inquiry. Mentalistic terms were

banished.

While for behaviorism everything is subjective, the idea would then be

to respond conscious activity to observable notions. Therefore, for the

behaviorist approach, consciousness would be an effect where it would

behaviorism that considers that consciousness is nothing more than a

reduction to what can be observed with a high subjective load that falls

in practice on human judges who condemn others.

But, what triggers the state of consciousness, that is to say, how is

consciousness produced and manifested, that is to say, if an individual

consciousness exists, could it disturb a collective consciousness? Now,

if an individual consciousness exists, could it manage other states of

consciousness?

If we are not clear about this diatribe in terms of what is implied in the

conformation of individual and collective consciousness, how do we

on: The way we perceive reality.

Reality is also a complex phenomenon to define. What is reality for me

is not reality for someone else, therefore, the term realities, since

reality does not exist, it is only a social imaginary built from the visions

that homogenize and universalize everything as if it were about

humans and uniform cultures. However, we perceive it.

In general terms, perception can be defined as the set of processes and

activities related to the stimulation that reaches the senses, through

which we obtain information about our habitat, the actions we perform

it is not conscious for some, and the question is: How to make a fact

conscious from a thought to an emotion? Hence, communities tend to

perceive realities according to collective imaginaries and social

representations installed by the structures that intervene them, in

which the academy is no exception.

In such a way that, when there is no awareness of a fact, a piece of

awareness is borrowed and assimilated, transformed and sought to be

understood. This is what usually happens when communities

intervene with projects that did not emerge from their real needs but

from someone who thought of them at a desk or intuited them as

without underestimating their usefulness, do not always represent the

reflection of real social realities.

Other ways of creating consciousness are all the institutional and

organizational organisms that mark and direct the way in which the

state of "consciousness" must function or at least move.

Thus understanding the construction of consciousness, in covid 19 and

post covid 19 times, it is really difficult to overcome the construction

of consciousness from the learned hopelessness to which the traps of

the hypertrophic discourse opened the doors, determined to interpret

everything in a biased, dichotomized, polarized and ideologized way,

knowledge? It is the stellar moment to introduce the benefits of the

These ways of approaching social realities, give relevance to the styles

of university approach, conceived as accompaniments and not as

interventionist projects, in which it is worth the usefulness that today,

for example, television and mass media, who have changed the

formation of healthy topois or strong social groups, which in no way

constitute new forms of social movements, but rather the construction

of citizen networks.

Thus, there is an urgent need for new forms of symbolic mediation that

overcome the biases provided by a vision of reality, according to

Salgado, E. ( ob. cit): "Selected, sometimes intentionally manipulated

for specific purposes; in short, an atrophied, saturated, if not

spectacularized perspective". On the contrary, the pansyncretic

integrating discourse seeks to build from the fabric of knowledge and

humanities in constant dialogues, since it is not a matter of linking but

require strong healthy topois, new logics of insertion into society,

knowledge in complexus, and high vibratory states of individual and

collective consciousness and that, definitely, is not possible to solve it

from technology in monologue with itself or from knowledge that

already considers to have the answers to all the requirements of each

different social space. Therefore, the result of the pandemic and post

pandemic is always the same; fear, new social pathologies, separation

of humanities, anguish and learned hopelessness and therefore,

paradigmatic and social paralysis concealed in the instrumental and

now human machines.

psychological body, the social body and the spiritual body, from which

another phenomenon is produced; which is delirium. Delirium is the

requirements of the new era.

But what is academic knowledge, academic thinking and academic

results? It is something very simple: the constant search for truth and

certainties. It is a dynamic turn by the struggle and perseverance to

some epistemological tendencies of the Academy, walks towards more

integrative forms of thoughts such as the Pansyncretic Discourse.

Covid 19 changed the world and continues to do so, and with it, it

continues to reinforce a narrative to understand social and human

problems from hypertrophies or interpretations either biased by

with a vision of integrative pansyncretic thoughts, which do not

represent moments of utopias, since knowledge is integrated as the

same represents the loop of life.

behavioral approaches, since it is not possible to reach higher levels of

consciousness simply by existing. Consciousness does not function like

a computer, nor is it generated solely through evolutionary processes,

and even less, it is the effect of observation. Consciousness is a much

deeper subject that should not only be understood through its effects.

To build social, human, academic, scientific and research fabrics based

on Topoic Culture, from a conception of strong socially healthy teams

with a transdisciplinary and integrative vision. Developing Topoic

Culture implies transcending the conventional concept of the Academy

inherited from the blurred modernity, which implies overcoming the

a base of enlightenment rather than as a space of accompaniments.